Interest rates, bonds and risk
By the end of this lecture you will be able to
- Price a bond, find its yield to maturity and explain clean and dirty prices
- Read the yield curve: spot and forward rates, its shapes and the theories behind them, and how central-bank policy reaches long rates
- Measure interest-rate risk with Macaulay and modified duration, DV01 and convexity
- Explain credit spreads, ratings, beta and why equity costs more than debt
- Trace how a change in rates moves WACC, valuation multiples and LBO debt capacity
Last time we treated the discount rate as given. Today we ask where it comes from. We start with the simplest risky asset, a bond: how to price it, what its yield means and how much its price moves when rates change. We then read the yield curve, price credit risk and work out the return shareholders demand, and we finish with how all of it feeds into WACC, valuation multiples and the financing of a leveraged buyout.
1. Where interest rates come from
An interest rate is the price of borrowing money for a period of time, set by supply and demand between savers and borrowers. At the short end, one player has outsized influence: the central bank. It sets a policy rate at which banks borrow or deposit overnight: the Federal Reserve targets a range for the federal funds rate, and the European Central Bank sets, among others, its deposit facility rate. Overnight market rates follow; the benchmarks are SOFR, the secured overnight financing rate, in dollars and €STR in euros. Longer rates are set by the market and contain more than the policy rate. A useful way to break any yield into pieces:
The first two pieces together are what the market expects short-term rates to average over the life of the bond. The term premium is the extra return investors want for locking money away longer and bearing the risk that rates move. A government bond in its own currency is treated as free of default risk, so it has no credit spread, and its yield is our risk-free rate. That convention works for the United States, Germany or the United Kingdom; for a government that could plausibly default, analysts strip a default spread out of its yield first.
2. What a bond is
A bond is a loan cut into tradable pieces. The issuer promises two things: a coupon, a fixed interest payment each period, and the face value, usually $1,000, at maturity. Governments issue bonds, and so do companies, from investment-grade giants to small miners funding a new pit.
US Treasuries and most US corporate bonds pay coupons twice a year; German Bunds, French OATs and most euro corporate bonds pay once a year. Prices are quoted as a percentage of face value, so a bond "at 98.5" costs $985 per $1,000. Banks' debt capital markets teams bring new issues to market, as we see in lecture 13.
3. Pricing a bond
A bond's price is the present value of its promised payments, discounted at the return the market currently demands, the yield:
Look at the structure: an annuity, the coupons, plus a single zero-coupon payment, the face value. Every bond calculation you will meet uses one or both of those pieces.
Worked example
A five-year bond with $1,000 face value pays a 5% annual coupon, so $50 a year. Similar bonds now yield 6%. The coupons are an annuity worth \(50 \times 4.2124 = \$210.62\) and the face value is worth \(1{,}000 / 1.06^5 = \$747.26\). The bond trades at $957.88, below face value, because its 5% coupon is less attractive than the 6% the market can get elsewhere.
Had it paid the same coupon semi-annually, $25 every six months, with the 6% yield quoted on the usual semi-annual basis, you would discount ten half-years at 3%, and the price would be $957.35.
4. Price and yield move in opposite directions
This is the single most important fact about bonds. The coupon is fixed when the bond is issued. If market yields rise, the fixed coupon becomes less attractive, so the price must fall until the bond offers the new yield to a buyer. If yields fall, the price rises.
- Coupon equal to yield: the bond trades at par, its face value.
- Coupon above yield: it trades at a premium.
- Coupon below yield: it trades at a discount, like our example.
Prices also move with time, even when yields do not. As a bond nears maturity, its price converges to face value: the pull to par. If the yield stays at 6%, our discount bond is worth $965.35 a year from now, then $973.27, $981.67, $990.57 and finally $1,000. A premium bond drifts down in the same way. The drift is part of the return. A buyer at $957.88 earns the $50 coupon plus $7.47 of price gain in the first year, $57.47 in total, which is exactly 6% of the price paid.
5. Yield to maturity and current yield
Usually we know the price and want the yield. The yield to maturity (YTM) is the single discount rate that makes the present value of all promised payments equal to the price. You will recognise it: it is the bond's IRR. A coupon bond has no closed-form solution, so you solve by trial or with a spreadsheet's YIELD or RATE function.
Worked example
A four-year bond with a 7% annual coupon trades at $1,050. At a 6% yield it would be worth $1,034.65, too little, so the yield must be lower. At 5.5% it would be worth $1,052.58, slightly too much. The YTM is 5.57%. The current yield is simply the coupon divided by the price: \(70/1{,}050 = 6.67\%\). It overstates the return on a premium bond because it ignores the $50 the holder loses as the price pulls back to par. A quick approximation, \([C + (F-P)/N] / [(F+P)/2]\), gets close: \((70 - 12.5)/1{,}025 = 5.61\%\).
Two warnings about YTM. First, like any IRR, it equals your realised return only if you hold to maturity, every payment is made, and every coupon is reinvested at the YTM itself. Second, for a bond that might default, the YTM is a promised yield, not an expected one: a distressed bond yielding 18% is pricing a real chance of not being repaid in full.
Many corporate bonds, especially high-yield ones, are callable: the issuer can repay early at set prices. Investors then compute a yield to call for each call date and quote the lowest of these yields and the YTM, the yield to worst. For a bond trading above its call price, the yield to worst is usually a yield to call, because the issuer will refinance if rates fall.
Pause and think: a bond trades at $1,080 with a $1,000 face value. Is its coupon rate above or below its yield to maturity? And its current yield?
The coupon rate is above the YTM. Investors pay a premium because the coupon is richer than the market yield. Over the bond's life the price will drift back to $1,000, and that built-in loss brings the yield below the coupon. The current yield sits between the two: the coupon divided by $1,080 is below the coupon rate, but it ignores the pull to par, so it is above the YTM.
6. Clean and dirty prices
Coupons are paid on fixed dates, but bonds trade every day. A buyer between coupon dates receives the whole next coupon, although the seller owned the bond for part of the period. So the buyer pays the seller the accrued interest, the share of the coupon earned since the last payment date:
Bonds are quoted at the clean price, which excludes accrued interest, because the dirty price saw-tooths: it climbs between coupon dates and drops by the coupon on each payment date even when the market is still. The buyer actually pays the dirty price, also called the full or invoice price, and it is the dirty price that equals the present value of the remaining cash flows.
Worked example
A US corporate bond pays a 6% coupon semi-annually, $3 per $100 face every six months, on 15 March and 15 September. It uses the 30/360 day count, in which every month has 30 days. You buy on 1 June at a clean price of 98.50. From 15 March to 15 May is 60 days, plus 16 days to 1 June: 76 days of a 180-day period. Accrued interest is \(3 \times 76/180 = 1.2667\), so the dirty price is \(98.50 + 1.2667 = 99.7667\). On $1 million of face value you pay $997,666.67.
Day counts vary: US Treasuries and most euro-denominated bonds use actual/actual, US corporates 30/360. Use the wrong one and your accrued interest is wrong.
7. Spot rates and forward rates
So far we have discounted every cash flow of a bond at one rate, its YTM. That is a convenient summary, but it is not how the market really prices. A payment due in one year and a payment due in ten years are different products, and each has its own rate. The yield on a zero-coupon bond maturing at \(t\) is the spot rate \(s_t\), and the correct price of any bond discounts each cash flow at the spot rate for its date:
A coupon bond's YTM is then a kind of average of the spot rates for its payment dates, weighted towards the final payment.
Spot rates come from bond prices, by bootstrapping. Suppose the one-year zero yields 4.00% and a two-year bond with a 6% annual coupon trades at 101.91. Its first coupon is worth \(6/1.04 = 5.77\). The rest of the price, 96.14, must be the value of the 106 paid in year 2, so \((1+s_2)^2 = 106/96.14\) and \(s_2 = 5.00\%\). Repeat with a three-year bond to get \(s_3\), and so on along the curve.
Spot rates imply forward rates: the rate for lending between two future dates that you can lock in today. Investing for two years at the two-year spot rate must give the same result as investing for one year and rolling over at the forward rate \(f_{1,2}\); otherwise there would be a free lunch:
Worked example
With \(s_1 = 4\%\) and \(s_2 = 5\%\), \(f_{1,2} = 1.05^2/1.04 - 1 = 6.01\%\). Roughly, the two-year rate is the average of this year's rate and next year's forward: \(5\% \approx (4\% + 6\%)/2\). If the three-year spot rate is 5.5%, the forward from year 2 to year 3 is \(1.055^3/1.05^2 - 1 = 6.51\%\).
Read a forward rate as a break-even, not a forecast. It is the future rate at which you would be indifferent between the long investment and rolling short ones. If investors cared only about expected returns, it would equal the expected future short rate; in reality it also contains a term premium.
8. The shape of the yield curve
Plot the yields of government bonds against their maturities and you get the yield curve. Its shape is one of the most watched indicators in finance.
- Normal, or upward sloping: long rates above short rates. This is the usual shape, because investors want a premium for tying money up longer.
- Flat: short and long rates close together, often a transition between the other shapes.
- Inverted: short rates above long rates. The market expects the central bank to cut, typically because it sees a slowdown coming. The US curve has inverted ahead of almost every recession of the past half-century, which is why the gap between 2-year and 10-year yields is watched so closely. It is a loose signal, not a law: that gap stayed negative from mid-2022 to late summer 2024, the longest inversion on record.
- Humped: medium maturities yield more than both short and long ones, for example when markets expect rates to rise for a while and then fall.
Three theories explain the shape, and a strong interview answer uses all three.
- Expectations hypothesis. Long rates are the average of expected future short rates. An upward curve means the market expects rates to rise; an inverted one means it expects cuts. On its own this cannot explain why the curve slopes upward most of the time, since rates do not rise most of the time.
- Liquidity preference, or the term premium. Investors prefer short maturities, which are less exposed to rate moves, so they demand extra yield to hold long bonds. This adds an upward tilt to whatever expectations imply.
- Market segmentation, and its softer version, preferred habitat. Different investors have natural maturities: money market funds buy short, pension funds and insurers buy long to match their liabilities. Supply and demand within each segment move its yield. Central-bank bond buying works partly through this channel.
9. How central-bank policy reaches long rates
A central bank controls the overnight rate directly. Its influence on a ten-year yield is indirect, through four channels.
- Expectations. The ten-year yield reflects the expected path of short rates over ten years. A single hike matters less than what it signals about the next ones, which is why markets move on central bankers' guidance.
- Inflation credibility. If investors believe the bank will hold inflation near its target, usually 2%, expected inflation in long yields stays anchored. If that credibility slips, long yields can rise even while the bank cuts.
- The balance sheet. Through quantitative easing (QE), a central bank buys long bonds, pushing their prices up and yields down, mostly by compressing the term premium. Quantitative tightening (QT) works the other way.
- Floating-rate loans. Many loans, from mortgages in much of Europe to the term loans in a leveraged buyout, are priced at a benchmark such as SOFR or EURIBOR plus a margin. A policy move reaches these borrowers at the next reset date.
Short and long rates can therefore move in opposite directions. Between September and December 2024 the Federal Reserve cut its policy rate by a full point, while the ten-year Treasury yield rose by close to a point, as markets priced a stronger economy, fewer future cuts and a larger term premium. "The Fed cut, so long rates fall" is a common and wrong interview answer.
10. Duration: how sensitive is the price?
Not all bonds react equally to a change in rates. A one-year bond barely moves; a thirty-year bond can swing violently. Duration measures that sensitivity. The Macaulay duration is the average time at which you receive your cash, each payment weighted by its share of the bond's present value:
Worked example
Our five-year 5% bond at a 6% yield:
| Year | Cash flow | PV at 6% | Weight | Year × weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 47.17 | 4.9% | 0.049 |
| 2 | 50 | 44.50 | 4.6% | 0.093 |
| 3 | 50 | 41.98 | 4.4% | 0.131 |
| 4 | 50 | 39.60 | 4.1% | 0.165 |
| 5 | 1,050 | 784.62 | 81.9% | 4.096 |
| Total | 957.88 | 100% | 4.53 |
The Macaulay duration is 4.53 years, a little under five because the coupons arrive earlier.
The working version is modified duration, Macaulay duration divided by \(1+y\). It gives the approximate percentage price change for a small move in yield:
Worked example
Our bond's modified duration is \(4.53/1.06 = 4.28\). If yields rise from 6% to 7%, duration predicts a fall of 4.28%, to $916.90. The exact price at 7% is $918.00, a fall of 4.16%. If yields fall to 5%, duration predicts a rise of 4.28%, but the bond actually rises 4.40%, to exactly $1,000, since at 5% the coupon equals the yield. Duration slightly overstates the loss and understates the gain. That asymmetry is convexity, which we come to next.
DV01. Traders think in money, not percentages. The DV01, the dollar value of one basis point, is the price change for a 0.01% move in yield: modified duration × price × 0.0001. For our bond, \(4.28 \times 957.88 \times 0.0001 = \$0.41\) per $1,000 of face value. A $10 million position in a bond trading at par with a modified duration of 7 has a DV01 of $7,000: every basis point makes or loses $7,000.
Rules of thumb: duration rises with maturity and falls as the coupon or the yield rises. A zero-coupon bond's Macaulay duration equals its maturity. A perpetuity's Macaulay duration is \((1+y)/y\): 21 years at a 5% yield, although it never matures. For a one-point rise in yields from 5% to 6%, a 10-year par bond loses 7.4%, a 10-year zero 9.0%, a 30-year par bond 13.8% and a 30-year zero 24.8%.
11. Convexity
Duration draws a straight line, the tangent, through a price–yield curve that is actually bent. The bend is convexity, and adding it gives a better estimate:
Worked example
Our bond has a convexity of 23.4. For a one-point rise in yields: \(-4.28\% + \tfrac12 \times 23.4 \times 0.01^2\), which is \(-4.28\% + 0.12\% = -4.16\%\), matching the exact answer. For a two-point rise, duration alone predicts −8.56%; with convexity, −8.09%; the exact fall is −8.11%. The bigger the move, the more convexity matters.
Positive convexity is valuable: whichever way rates move, a convex bond gains more or loses less than duration predicts. All plain bonds have it. Callable bonds and mortgage-backed securities can have negative convexity: when rates fall, the issuer or the homeowner refinances, which caps the price gain. For these, analysts use effective duration, measured by repricing the bond under shifted yields.
Duration beyond bonds. Any asset whose cash flows arrive far in the future has a long duration. A growing perpetuity has a modified duration of about \(1/(r-g)\), so a share valued at \(r = 9\%\) and \(g = 3\%\) behaves like a bond with a duration of nearly 17 years. Raise the discount rate by one point and its value falls by 14.3%, from \(C/0.06\) to \(C/0.07\); with 5% growth the fall is 20%. A start-up that will only make money in ten years is an even longer-duration asset, which is why its valuation collapses when rates rise.
12. Credit risk, ratings and spreads
A company is not a government. It can default. Investors demand compensation for that risk in the form of a credit spread over the risk-free rate:
Spreads are quoted in basis points, hundredths of a percent, usually over a government bond of similar maturity or over the swap curve. The credit default swap (CDS) market prices the same risk directly. Rating agencies grade issuers on scales that run from the strongest to default:
| S&P and Fitch | Moody's | Category |
|---|---|---|
| AAA, AA | Aaa, Aa | High grade |
| A | A | Upper medium grade |
| BBB | Baa | Lowest investment grade |
| BB | Ba | High yield: speculative |
| B | B | High yield: highly speculative |
| CCC and below | Caa and below | Substantial risk, near or in default |
Each grade has notches: A+, A and A− at S&P and Fitch, A1, A2 and A3 at Moody's. BBB−, or Baa3, is the last rung of investment grade; below it is high yield, also called junk. Many funds may only hold investment-grade bonds, so a downgrade across the line, a fallen angel, forces selling. Historically, single-B issuers have defaulted at a few percent a year on average, investment grade at a small fraction of a percent. Ratings map loosely onto leverage: investment-grade industrials tend to run below about 3x net debt to EBITDA, while leveraged buyouts usually carry single-B ratings at 5x or more.
The spread compensates first for expected loss: the probability of default times the loss given default, which is one minus the recovery rate. An issuer with a 2% annual chance of default and a 40% expected recovery has an expected loss of \(2\% \times 60\% = 1.2\%\) a year, or 120 bp. Observed spreads are larger than expected losses, often several times larger for investment grade, because investors also charge for uncertainty, for the way defaults cluster in recessions, and for poorer liquidity than government bonds.
Worked example
The 10-year Treasury yields 4.5% and a miner's 10-year bonds, issued at par with a 7.2% coupon, yield 7.2%. The spread is 270 basis points. A bad quarter pushes the spread to 400 basis points, so the yield rises to 8.5% and the price falls to $914.70, a loss of 8.5%. The bond's modified duration of 7.0 predicted 9.0%; convexity cushions the rest. Nothing about the coupon changed; the market's view of the risk did.
Where students go wrong
Saying "the bond's yield went up, so investors earn more, so it is worth more." The opposite is true for an existing bond: its cash flows are fixed, so a higher yield means a lower price. The new buyer earns more precisely because they pay less. Three related slips: treating a risky bond's YTM as its expected return, when it is the promised return; comparing a semi-annual yield with an annual one; and using duration alone for large moves, where convexity matters.
13. Risk and return for shareholders
Shareholders face more risk than lenders, so they want more return. But which risk? Here finance makes a subtle and powerful point.
A share's price swings for two kinds of reasons. Some are specific to the company: a mine floods, a CEO resigns. That is idiosyncratic risk, and an investor holding many shares can diversify it away, because one company's bad news is offset by another's good news. Other swings hit everything at once: recessions, interest rates, a market crash. That is systematic risk, and no amount of diversification removes it.
Because investors can diversify away the first kind for free, markets only pay a premium for the second. We measure a share's exposure to systematic risk with beta: a beta of 1 moves with the market, 1.5 moves 50% more, 0.5 moves half as much. Beta is estimated by regressing the stock's returns on the market's, usually over two to five years of weekly or monthly data. Equivalently, \(\beta = \rho\,\sigma_i/\sigma_m\): the correlation with the market times the ratio of volatilities. A stock with 40% volatility and a 0.6 correlation with a market of 18% volatility has a beta of \(0.6 \times 40/18 = 1.33\). A volatile stock can still have a low beta if its swings are mostly its own; gold miners are a classic case.
The capital asset pricing model turns beta into a required return:
The term in brackets is the equity risk premium, the extra return investors expect from the market as a whole over government bonds, often taken somewhere around 5% to 6%.
Worked example
Risk-free rate 4%, beta 1.2, equity risk premium 5.5%. The cost of equity is \(4\% + 1.2 \times 5.5\% = 10.6\%\). We plug exactly this number into a WACC in lecture 10, where we also see that debt raises beta, because it makes equity returns more volatile, and how to strip that effect out.
14. Why equity costs more than debt
Lenders are paid first, receive a contractual amount and often hold security over assets. Shareholders are paid last, from whatever is left, with no promise at all. Their returns are more volatile and they lose everything first in a bankruptcy. So equity always demands a higher return than the same company's debt. Debt has a second advantage: interest is usually tax-deductible, which lowers its cost further. A 6% pre-tax cost of debt at a 25% tax rate costs \(6\% \times (1 - 25\%) = 4.5\%\) after tax. Hold onto both facts; they drive capital structure, WACC and the whole logic of a leveraged buyout.
15. From rates to valuation and deals
Everything in this lecture lands in three places later in the course.
WACC. The risk-free rate enters twice: in the cost of equity, through CAPM, and in the cost of debt, as the base under the credit spread. Take a company financed 70% by equity and 30% by debt, with a 25% tax rate. If government yields rise one point while spreads and the equity risk premium stay put, the cost of equity rises one point and the after-tax cost of debt 0.75 points, so WACC rises by \(0.7 \times 1 + 0.3 \times 0.75 = 0.925\) points.
Multiples. A growing perpetuity is a multiple: enterprise value is roughly next year's free cash flow divided by \(WACC - g\). With an 8% WACC and 2.5% growth, that is 18.2 times next year's cash flow. Add 0.925 points to WACC and the multiple drops to 15.6 times, a 14.4% fall in value with no change in the business. This is the mechanism behind "rising rates compress multiples", and it bites hardest where growth is high and the denominator small.
LBO financing. Leveraged loans pay floating rates, so higher policy rates raise interest costs at the next reset: on a $500m term loan at SOFR plus 3.5%, a move in SOFR from 1% to 5% lifts annual interest from $22.5m to $42.5m. Lenders also cap debt by interest coverage. If they require EBITDA to cover interest at least 2.5 times, a company with $100m of EBITDA can carry at most $40m of interest. At a 7% all-in rate that supports $571m of debt, 5.7x EBITDA; at 10%, only $400m, 4.0x. The sponsor must fill the gap with equity or pay a lower price, and either way returns fall. Sponsors often hedge part of the floating exposure with interest rate swaps, paying fixed and receiving floating.
In the interview
“If interest rates rise by 1%, what happens to a bond's price?”
It falls, because its fixed coupons are now less attractive than new bonds. The size of the fall depends on duration: roughly the modified duration times 1%. A bond with a modified duration of 7 would fall about 7%, slightly less in practice because of convexity.
“Which is more sensitive to rates: a 10-year zero-coupon bond or a 10-year bond with a 5% coupon?”
The zero. All its value arrives in year 10, so its duration is 10 years; the coupon bond returns part of its value earlier, so its duration is about 8 years at a 5% yield. For a one-point rise, the zero loses about 9% and the coupon bond about 7.4%.
“What does an inverted yield curve tell you?”
That short rates are above long rates, usually because the market expects the central bank to cut ahead of a slowdown. A strong answer names the three theories, notes that inversions have preceded most US recessions, and adds that the signal is loose.
“The Fed cuts rates by 50 basis points. What happens to the 10-year Treasury yield?”
It may not fall, and it can rise. The ten-year yield depends on expected future short rates, inflation expectations and the term premium. If the cut was priced in, little moves; if markets read it as raising inflation risk, long yields can rise, as they did in late 2024.
“Why is the cost of equity higher than the cost of debt?”
Equity holders are paid last and have no guaranteed return, so they bear more risk and require more return. Debt is senior, contractual and often secured, and its interest is tax-deductible, which lowers its after-tax cost further.
“How do higher interest rates affect an LBO?”
Cover entry, holding period and exit. At entry, coverage limits mean less debt, so the sponsor needs more equity or must pay less. During the hold, floating-rate interest absorbs cash that would have repaid debt. At exit, higher rates tend to mean lower multiples. All three push returns down, which is why buyout activity slows when rates rise.
Key takeaways
- A rate ≈ expected real rate + expected inflation + term premium + credit spread. The central bank sets the overnight rate; the market sets long rates.
- A bond price is the PV of coupons and face value at the market yield; price and yield move in opposite directions, and prices pull to par over time.
- YTM is the bond’s IRR and a promised, not expected, return; current yield ignores the pull to par. Callable bonds are quoted at yield to worst.
- Bonds are quoted clean; buyers pay dirty = clean + accrued interest, using the bond’s day count.
- Spot rates price each cash flow; forward rates are break-evens: (1+s₂)² = (1+s₁)(1+f₁,₂). Curve shapes reflect expectations, term premium and segmentation.
- Modified duration = Macaulay/(1+y) gives %ΔP ≈ −D × Δy; DV01 is the money change per basis point; convexity improves the estimate for large moves.
- Spreads cover expected loss (PD × LGD) plus a premium; BBB−/Baa3 is the investment-grade line. CAPM: cost of equity = rf + β × ERP, and equity costs more than debt.
- Higher rates raise WACC, compress multiples (EV ≈ FCF₁/(WACC − g)) and shrink LBO debt capacity through interest cover.
Problem set
1Price (a) a 10-year zero-coupon bond with $1,000 face value at a 5% yield, and (b) a 3-year bond paying an 8% annual coupon on $1,000 face value when the market yield is 6%. What is the current yield of (b)?
(a) \(1{,}000 / 1.05^{10} = 1{,}000 / 1.6289 = \$613.91\).
(b) \(80/1.06 + 80/1.06^2 + 1{,}080/1.06^3\), which is \(75.47 + 71.20 + 906.79 = \$1{,}053.46\). A premium, as expected, since the coupon exceeds the yield.
Current yield: \(80 / 1{,}053.46 = 7.59\%\), above the 6% YTM because it ignores the $53.46 the holder loses as the price pulls to par.
2A 10-year US corporate bond pays a 4% coupon semi-annually on $1,000 face value. Its yield is 5%, quoted on the usual semi-annual basis. Price it, and give its effective annual yield.
Work in half-years: 20 periods, a $20 coupon and 2.5% a period. The coupons are worth \(20 \times (1 - 1.025^{-20})/0.025\), which is \(20 \times 15.5892 = \$311.78\). The face value is worth \(1{,}000/1.025^{20} = 1{,}000/1.6386 = \$610.27\). The price is $922.05.
The effective annual yield is \(1.025^2 - 1 = 5.0625\%\). Pricing with annual compounding at 5% would give $922.78: close, but wrong for this market.
3A 4-year bond with a 6% annual coupon trades at $965. Find its yield to maturity, its current yield, and the quick approximation of the YTM.
At 7% the bond would be worth $966.13, slightly above $965, so the yield is a little above 7%. At 7.03% it is worth $965.14. The YTM is 7.03%.
Current yield: \(60/965 = 6.22\%\), below the YTM because it ignores the $35 the holder gains as the price pulls to par.
Approximation: \([60 + 35/4] / [(1{,}000 + 965)/2]\), which is \(68.75 / 982.5 = 7.00\%\).
4A US corporate bond pays a 5% coupon semi-annually on 1 January and 1 July and uses the 30/360 day count. You buy $5 million face value for settlement on 20 October at a clean price of 96.25. How much accrued interest do you pay, and what is the total cash?
The coupon per period is 2.5 per 100. On 30/360, 1 July to 1 October is 90 days, plus 19 days to 20 October: 109 days of 180. Accrued interest is \(2.5 \times 109/180 = 1.5139\) per 100, so the dirty price is \(96.25 + 1.5139 = 97.7639\).
Cash: \(5{,}000{,}000 \times 0.977639 = \$4{,}888{,}194.44\), of which $75,694.44 is accrued interest. On 1 January you receive the full $125,000 coupon, which repays what you advanced the seller.
5Spot rates are 3.5% for one year, 4.2% for two years and 4.6% for three years. Find the one-year forward rates starting in one year and in two years. Then price a 3-year bond with a 6% annual coupon (per 100 of face value) off this curve, and find its YTM.
\(f_{1,2} = 1.042^2/1.035 - 1 = 4.90\%\) and \(f_{2,3} = 1.046^3/1.042^2 - 1 = 5.40\%\). A rising curve implies rising forwards.
Price: \(6/1.035 + 6/1.042^2 + 106/1.046^3\), which is \(5.797 + 5.526 + 92.621 = 103.94\).
The single rate that reproduces 103.94 is 4.56%, slightly below the 4.6% three-year spot rate, because the early coupons are discounted at the lower short rates.
6For the 3-year 8% bond of problem 1 at a 6% yield, compute the Macaulay duration, modified duration and convexity. Estimate the price change for a 200 bp rise in yields with duration alone and with convexity, and compare with the exact answer.
The present values 75.47, 71.20 and 906.79 are 7.16%, 6.76% and 86.08% of the $1,053.46 price. Macaulay duration: \(1 \times 0.0716 + 2 \times 0.0676 + 3 \times 0.8608 = 2.79\) years. Modified duration: \(2.79/1.06 = 2.63\).
Convexity: weight each share by \(t(t+1)\), so \(2 \times 0.0716 + 6 \times 0.0676 + 12 \times 0.8608 = 10.878\), then divide by \(1.06^2 = 1.1236\) to get 9.68.
For +200 bp, duration alone gives \(-2.63 \times 2\% = -5.26\%\). With convexity: \(-5.26\% + \tfrac12 \times 9.68 \times 0.02^2\), which is \(-5.26\% + 0.19\% = -5.07\%\). Exact: at 8% the coupon equals the yield, so the bond is worth $1,000, a fall of 5.07%.
7A B-rated issuer’s 5-year bonds yield 9.0% while 5-year Treasuries yield 4.3%. Analysts expect a 3% annual default probability and a 40% recovery. How much of the spread is expected loss, and what is the rest?
The spread is \(9.0\% - 4.3\% = 470\) bp. Expected loss is \(3\% \times (1 - 40\%) = 1.8\%\), or 180 bp. The remaining 290 bp is the premium investors charge for bearing the uncertainty, the clustering of defaults in recessions and the bonds' poorer liquidity.
The 9% is the promised yield. The expected return is roughly \(9.0\% - 1.8\% = 7.2\%\), still well above Treasuries.
8A stock has 35% annual volatility and a 0.5 correlation with the market, whose volatility is 16%. The risk-free rate is 4.25% and the equity risk premium 5%. What is its beta and its cost of equity? Why is its beta close to 1 although it is more than twice as volatile as the market?
\(\beta = \rho\,\sigma_i/\sigma_m = 0.5 \times 35/16 = 1.094\). Cost of equity: \(4.25\% + 1.094 \times 5\% = 9.72\%\).
Only the part of the risk that moves with the market is rewarded. With a correlation of 0.5, the systematic part of the volatility is \(0.5 \times 35\% = 17.5\%\), only slightly above the market's 16%. The rest is company-specific and can be diversified away.
9Government bond yields rise by 1.5 points. A company is financed 60% by equity and 40% by debt, pays 25% tax, has a WACC of 8.5% and a terminal growth rate of 2%. Credit spreads and the equity risk premium do not change. Estimate the new WACC and the change in the terminal value multiple.
The cost of equity rises 1.5 points and the pre-tax cost of debt 1.5 points, which is \(1.5 \times 0.75 = 1.125\) points after tax. WACC rises by \(0.6 \times 1.5 + 0.4 \times 1.125 = 0.90 + 0.45 = 1.35\) points, to 9.85%.
The terminal multiple \(1/(WACC - g)\) falls from \(1/0.065 = 15.4\text{x}\) to \(1/0.0785 = 12.7\text{x}\), a 17.2% fall in terminal value.
In an interview, add the caveat: if the rise in yields reflects higher expected inflation, nominal growth may rise too, offsetting part of the effect.
10A sponsor is buying a company with $80m of EBITDA. Lenders require EBITDA to cover interest at least twice. How much debt can the deal carry at an all-in rate of 8%? At 9.5%? If the price is fixed at $800m, how much more equity does the sponsor need?
Maximum interest is \(80/2 = \$40\text{m}\). At 8% that supports \(40/0.08 = \$500\text{m}\) of debt, 6.25x EBITDA. At 9.5%, \(40/0.095 = \$421\text{m}\), 5.26x.
At an $800m price, equity rises from $300m to $379m: $79m more, a 26% larger cheque. Less leverage means lower returns on that equity, so to protect its IRR the sponsor has to bid less. A point and a half on rates took a full turn of EBITDA off the debt.
Interview questions on this lecture
If interest rates rise by 1%, what happens to a bond’s price?
It falls, because its fixed coupons are now less attractive than those of new bonds. The fall is roughly the bond’s modified duration times 1%: for a 10-year bond with a 4% coupon priced at par, duration is about 8.1, so the price falls by about 8%. Convexity makes the actual fall slightly smaller, 7.7%.
What happens to valuations when interest rates rise?
All else equal they fall: higher risk-free rates raise discount rates, so future cash flows are worth less. Long-duration assets such as growth stocks are hit hardest, and borrowers face higher interest costs.